A small population, north-facing slopes of the sky-island.
Mossy Cave trail, Bryce Canyon National Park
A great field of Calochortus, maybe 5/m2 over 5-7 ha.
All twig and inflorescence photos are from different twigs. Same with the leaf photos.
An unusual population that has characters of F. agrestis. But I lean towards calling it a localized form of F. liliacea, much like the unique F. biflora ineziana in northern San Mateo County.
Wacky manzanita in an area of Arctostaphylos canescens and Arctostaphlos crustacea. No burl, blooming at same time as A. canescens. But the leaves are more strigose than felty, are oddly shaped and almost auriculate (A. andersonii characters?), and setose hairs can occasionally be found on the stems and petioles.
Pic 6 adaxial, 7 abaxial. Biggest leaf I could find is 2.7cm tall x 1.8 wide. Pygmy forest acid soils. Right next to nummularia mendecinoensis and a glaucous weirdo.
In the middle of a large mixed stand of A. tomentosa and A. hookeri, this individual stands out - mainly due to its tiny leaves. It is upright, 2+ meters tall, and has no visible burl (I was also unable to find a burl by digging with my fingers, but there are several large stems suggesting a deeply buried burl is possible). The stems are as red and smooth as the surrounding hookeri, but the twigs are white and nonglandular puberulent to tomentose (although there are minute black spots on some twigs suggesting some glandularity). The leaves are only 1-2cm long, strongly bifacial, abaxially tomentose, and sparsely hairy above. They are similar in color to the surrounding tomentosa (much duller than the hookeri). The raceme-like (0-1 branches) nascent inflorescence is pendant and minutely nonglandular hairy (similar to the twigs) with leaf-like, lanceolate bracts. It shows no sign of preparing to bloom, putting it out of sync with both the tomentosa (which is already blooming) and the hookeri (which is about to start). I only found one berry that wasn't hollow and it appeared to have a fused nut – although it could have just gotten stuck together as it decayed.
So is this some kind of cross-clade tomentosa/hookeri hybrid? A really unusual A. crustacea crinita with a hidden burl? Or just one of the many, many obligate seeders I've never heard of?
The leaf comparison photo has the subject plant on the left followed by a hookeri leaf and a tomentosa leaf. The third photo shows it growing side by side with hookeri.
Looks most to me like a. hookeri, except out of range AFAIK. Does not appear to be cultivated, there were similar plants on another roadcut to the south.
-burl not present
-tomentose, non-glandular hair on new growth
-extremely prostrate growth habit
-panicles extremely tiny (could not get in focus) with brown scaly bracts similar to a. hookeri, smaller than a. montana
This isn't actually a good A. pungens; it is a hybrid between A. glauca and A. pungens, discovered by Morgan Stickrod eight months earlier:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/72000194
Unfortunately, iNat doesn't have a way to identify this as a hybrid, so it has to be given one of the parent names.
This is a clear hybrid:
Both parent species are found a short distance up SR78. The closest A. pungens along the road is here:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/101895779
The closest A. glauca along the road is here:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/101744692
Many thanks to Morgan for discovering this plant and posting it at iNat!
This nice patch is right on the bank of Hwy 20. By the blue glaucous color and prostrate habit, I would say they are viscida x nevadensis @sapienshane @morganstickrod
Small mixed population of nevadensis, patula and viscida and some apparent hybrids. They didn't look like the nevadensis x viscida hybrids seen near by. Maybe patula involved? Very easy to get to these, they are right above Hwy 20 @sapienshane @morganstickrod
A. canescens x nevadensis ssp. nevadensis. Location is from memory, may be a little off, but they were right along the Happy Camp-O'Brien Rd. near the summit in plain sight. Both parent species next too hybrids. Area has recently burned. The road was closed this year. @sapienshane @morganstickrod
Location is from memory - could be slightly off. A. viscida ssp. pulchella and A. nevadensis knightii were in area and likely parent species. @sapienshane @morganstickrod
Apparent hybrid between A. nortensis x nevadensis knightii. Both parent species in area. @sapienshane @morganstickrod
A. columbiana x nevadensis with both parent species present. @sapienshane @morganstickrod
Nevadensis hybrid? Viscida and patula in immediate vicinity
One of the most interesting hybrid swarms I have ever seen. Acres of extremely variable plants. A. nevadensis, mewukka, viscida, patula all present at this location. I've been trying to get Mike Vasey and Tom Parker to check out this spot for years! Not sure if any of the nevadensis is "pure" nevadensis. All of it seems to be integrated with other genes. Fairly low elevation for nevadensis for this region. A lot of other interesting plants also present at this location (Calochortus coeruleous, Calochortus nudus/minimus and hybrids between this one and coeruleous, Erythronium purpurescens - very low elevation for this one). @morganstickrod @dgreenberger
Apparent hybrid between nevadensis and mewukka var. mewukka. These plants have inflorescence similar to mewukka, burl, and low spreading habit like nevadensis. @morganstickrod
Arctostaphylos tomentosa var. bracteosa x pumila @morganstickrod Both parent species also present at this location.
Globular stem gall on Microseris sp....most likely M. douglasii...but based on my photos, I'm currently unable to verify species using the Jepson eFlora key. The nodding heads and phyllaries in this CalPhotos image are a good match, though there is also a record of M. bigelovii from the locale.
[As an aside, I found it amusing that the adaxial dark-red mid-ribs of the tepals in the Brodiaea terrestris...seen growing in the background in both photos...matched so well with the similar mid-ribs of the Microseris phyllaries. ;-].
Beyond James Bailey's iNat post under Antistrophus microseris, the only reference I could find for a stem gall on Microseris is in:
...where the original description of "Aylax microseris" is given on pg. 47. The species is referred to as Antistrophus microseris on this Wikipedia page...a name change also recognized on iNat.
The gall is described as "an irregular stem swelling" of "diameter 10-20 mm" and "length 20-30 mm", and is illustrated in Plate 1, Fig. 10 (to view, scroll down 3 pages from here). The gall here doesn't seem particularly irregular to me, and Fig. 10 shows longitudinal veins I see only vaguely intimated in the photo...but overall the match seems the best current alternative out there. The locale here is only a few miles from the type locality of Aylax microseris.
first time I've seen a bear eating bear berries!