Are there two species of oribi (Ourebia), instead of one?

Dear reader, can you spot the glaring error in the following picture of an oribi? (Scroll in https://www.wildlifeworldwide.com/locations/golden-gate-highlands-national-park.)

If your answer is not immediate, please see https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/milewski/69937-adaptive-colouration-in-the-oribi-southern-forms-are-more-conspicuous-than-northern-forms#.

The error is that the form of oribi (Ourebia) depicted for a national park in Free State province, South Africa, is completely the wrong form of oribi.

The real appearance of the oribi in Golden Gate National Park is this: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103241509.

Anyone familiar with the real oribi of South Africa should be able to spot, at first glance, that a photo from elsewhere in Africa has been carelessly inserted.

A search in Google Images quickly reveals that the photo (https://www.alamy.com/oribi-antelope-ethiopia-africa-wildlife-image335221666.html?imageid=6C385E16-3750-4D80-9C9B-C227349E09E3&p=836506&pn=1&searchId=d592d238c126347ec4d3725c2a7bbfc9&searchtype=0) was actually taken in central Ethiopia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senkelle_Swayne%27s_Hartebeest_Sanctuary).

(Another website for a conservation area, depicting the wrong oribi in several photos, is http://www.kzn-southcoast.com/oribi-antelope.html.)

But there is more to this question of identity than meets the eye.

According to the current, rather neglected, taxonomy, the correction would be merely one of subspecies.

However, is it perhaps time to rethink the number of species in this genus, in the first place?

The patterns on the hindquarters are so different that it seems that there may actually be different species involved.

Let us provisionally call these two postulated spp. the common oribi and the southern oribi.

The scientific names would be:

  • SOUTHERN ORIBI Ourebia ourebi (Zimmermann, 1783), vs
  • COMMON ORIBI Ourebia montana (Cretzschmar, 1826).

These two spp. differ mainly in that, in the former alone, the tail is black and the buttocks are extensively white. This means that, in the southern oribi, the hindquarters are conspicuous at a distance, whereas in the common oribi the hindquarters are not conspicuous at a distance.

This would seem to make adaptive sense.

The southern oribi, after all, tends to live in extensively treeless grasslands, where opportunities to hide are limited. By contrast, the common oribi tends to live in savannas, where not only is the grass relatively tall, but there is some cover of shrubs and saplings.

Another obvious difference is in the ground-colour, covering most of the body. This is dull fawn in the common oribi, but bright fawn in the southern oribi.

However, there is a biogeographically intriguing complication.

This is that a form resembling the southern oribi, rather than the common oribi, occurs over a large area in the western half of Zambia, extending widely into Angola and narrowly across the Caprivi Strip of Namibia, into northern Botswana.

The subspecies name of this Zambian form, which has been photographed mainly in Kafue (https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-oribi-ourebia-ourebi-kafue-national-park-zambia-11846014.html?imageid=B840C17C-6845-4AB0-9DA7-B971A6B338A4&p=74587&pn=1&searchId=45480e3d7233a9687b2df7a7f5357d3b&searchtype=0 and https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-oribi-ourebia-ourebi-kafue-national-park-zambia-11846018.html?imageid=857A4ABE-7DBB-44E5-A844-B03268BAA80C&p=74587&pn=1&searchId=45480e3d7233a9687b2df7a7f5357d3b&searchtype=0) and Liuwa Plain national parks, is currently O. o. rutila.

This looks more similar to the southern oribi than to the form in Zimbabwe, Malawi, and Mozambique at similar tropical latitudes - which is currently called subspecies O. o. hastata.

So, if we were to recognise two spp. of oribi, then the adjective 'southern' might be subject to two caveats, viz.

  • the distribution extends as far north as Katanga and north-central Angola, which are nearly equatorial, and
  • this distribution is disjunct, the gap corresponding to eastern Botswana and western Zimbabwe (with the exception of Kazuma Pan National Park, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazuma_Pan_National_Park, in the extreme northwest of Zimbabwe).

If true, what this would leave us with is a hitherto overlooked anomaly in the distribution of oribis in southern Africa.

This is that, when one crosses from the highlands of Limpopo province of South Africa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limpopo) to the southeastern part of Zimbabwe, one changes the species of oribi. Yet when one moves all the way from Gauteng province of South Africa, across the easternmost Kalahari, to northern Botswana, one does not change the species.

For some strange reason, it seems that the following may be true.

The common oribi - which occurs widely from West Africa to Ethiopia and then through East Africa to central Mozambique - has penetrated as far south as low-lying southeastern Zimbabwe (https://www.ewt.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/18.-Oribi-Ourebia-ourebi_EN.pdf).

Here, the common oribi may perhaps survive in the Save Conservancy (https://savevalleyconservancy.org/), but seems never to have been photographed.

And this new perspective also raises the question of the real identity of any populations remaining in southern Mozambique.

These have previously been assumed to belong to ssp. ourebi, which seems reasonable given the former occurrence of this species (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/235532) in the Lebombo mountains of northeastern Eswatini (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eswatini).

However, is it possible that the oribi occurring, or formerly occurring, in southern Mozambique, north and east of the Limpopo River (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limpopo_River#/media/File:Limpopo_River_basin_map.svg), is actually the common oribi, Ourebia montana hastata?

If so, this would mean that there are two species of oribi not only within the drainage of the Limpopo River, but also within the latitudes of Kruger National Park (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruger_National_Park).

These would be

Publicado el septiembre 15, 2022 01:12 TARDE por milewski milewski

Comentarios

Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

My sources are Roberts (1951) and Wilson and Reeder, volume 1 of Mammal Species of the World (pages 686-687 in Zhttps://books.google.com.au/books?id=JgAMbNSt8ikC&pg=PA677&lpg=PA677&dq=Synonymy+in+ourebia&source=bl&ots=QfeW3XjZ0d&sig=ACfU3U0UK6nPVX-CFnmkPkVM7nUXmMjVbw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBppzG8Zf6AhUQRWwGHdkHA5UQ6AF6BAgTEAM#v=onepage&q=Synonymy%20in%20ourebia&f=false).

The first forms of Ourebia to be named, after ourebi (1783), were scoparia (1785) and melanura (1799), which are synonymous with ourebi.

The next was montana (1826), followed a year later by quadriscopa (1827). The name hastata came only in 1852.

https://eol.org/pages/4447572 and http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/biology/resources/msw3/browse.asp?id=14200645

Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año
Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

Is there phylogenetic evidence for speciation of current Ourebia ourebi into two species? Phenotypically, they do vary, significantly.

Publicado por paradoxornithidae hace más de 1 año

@paradoxornithidae

Yes, there have been at least three studies, including van Vuren et al. (2017). These have indeed found genetic evidence that the South African form is a different species. However, they have not investigated the phenotypic evidence, at all.

https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/csp2.12767.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321879105_Phylogeography_of_Oribi_Antelope_in_South_Africa_Evolutionary_Versus_Anthropogenic_Panmixia

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15627020.2017.1386077

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910720300177

Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

Many thanks.

Publicado por paradoxornithidae hace más de 1 año
Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

Your findings are very interesting and remarkable, they could certainly be a reason to reconsider the view of the Oribi taxonomy. But in my personal opinion - If you are convinced, based on your research, that these two forms of Oribi should be taxonomically divided into two separate species, I think that iNaturalist is probably not the most suitable space where you firstly should present this issue. In order for it to have the necessary level, wouldn't it be better to connect directly with the people of the IUCN group for antelopes - specialists and experts who deal with this issue? These processes require getting your work into a taxonomic article form with all the necessary details so that it can meet the conditions of taxonomic revision. Among other things, from the point of view of phylogenetic evidence, it would probably be necessary to present more evidence of phenotypic difference, not just references to already existing references and individual images from different observations. A lot of weight should be given to systematically examine all the research sites, with new observations focused specifically on Oribi. You need as many samples as possible for comparison, either specific observations, or samples of fur, skulls and the like from as many museums as possible, where there are collections from confirmed locations. Undoubtedly, next genetic research is also very important.Because with some observations (outside of iNaturalist), it may not be possible to reliably verify that individual records are from the correct locations. I think this is the best procedure for you. Because if you only share this information here on iNaturalist, you can go unnoticed for a long time, and that would be a shame. I believe that a larger number of interested people can participate in this discussion, but as I wrote, perhaps it is better to directly address those who currently invest most of their working time in antelope taxonomy.

Publicado por michalsloviak hace más de 1 año

@michalsloviak

Many thanks for your thoughtful comments.

I have no aspirations, from a professional/career viewpoint, in publishing this or any other topic that I write about in iNaturalist. So, I doubt that I will be doing anything more on the topic of oribis, apart from continuing to be observant along the lines that led to this Post.

My aims, in writing Posts such as this, are mainly twofold, viz. a) to add value and depth to iNaturalist as a public platform, and b) to encourage awareness of nature in the interests of conservation.

So, I would encourage anyone interested in this topic, and the possibility of 'discovering', as it were, a new species of oribi, to do two things. These are a) to point this material out to the relevant professionals in the field, and/or b) to take this project on as their own.

What I mean by the latter is that I would be happiest if someone takes this ball and runs with it, with no particular regard for my having been the one who pointed out the potential in the topic. I seek no credit for any ideas or online research, and if someone forgot my name immediately and just made this their own active research project, never mentioning me once, I would be happy with that.

All I want is for naturalists and scientists to be aware of what I have pointed out, and to do whatever it takes to ensure the conservation of these animals.

In other words, I see my role as a catalyst rather than someone wishing to have his name associated with a new discovery. Please take this, bring it to fruition, and be unconcerned as to whether anybody ever cites this Post or my name. I will not be offended if I become immediately redundant.

And, by the way, the same applies to the other 'new taxa' I have pointed out, such as the western wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus mattosi) and the common klipspringer (Oreotragus transvaalensis).

Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

@tonyrebelo @michalsloviak @kurtvanwyk

I have just found a current reference to the occurrence of what I assume to be Ourebia montana hastata within the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (https://www.africaskysafari.com/south-zimbabwe-gonarezhou-national-park).

More particularly, it seems that Ourebia still occurs in Malilangwe Wildlife Reserve (https://www.jacadatravel.com/africa/zimbabwe/malilangwe-wildlife-reserve/), which borders Gonarezhou National Park.

If I am right about the identity of the oribi in southeastern Zimbabwe, this would confirm that, within the catchment of the Limpopo River, we have two different spp. of Ourebia, to this day.

The first iNaturalist to Post an image of Ourebia at Malilangwe may achieve a real 'scoop', in terms of adding another species to the antelope fauna of South Africa, in a slightly extended sense.

Publicado por milewski hace más de 1 año

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.