The black gastered ones. worker size was on the smaller side. Nest did not have any dug out piles of dirt.
Short story I've heard was that samples for identification were sent separately to California and New york some time ago and was identified as californicus and maricopa respectively.
I think this counts as maricopa, but with no certainty.
The maricopa and californicus imaged for comparison on the last picture are from
-https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/127195825
-https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142577471
should be a very familiar colony for many others?
did not see any fly in, so probably both from the same colony.
alates were seen almost every sunny afternoon, but first time to stay and watch the pornography
Colônia dentro de um casulo abandonado de mariposa
Colony inside an abandoned cocoon
Specimen images taken at Arizona State University.
Images:
Minor - profile
Major - profile
Minor - head
Major - head
Minor - dorsal
Major - dorsal
A new species that is being described at the Sertão Myrmecology Laboratory, in Bahia - BR.
Gnamptogenys minuta.
Pictures taken between February - April 2019.
Consider me dumbfounded, but Atta mexicana are officially established in Santa Cruz Co., AZ. With all of the recent alate observations north of the border (including a few of my own) it has become certain that established populations of this species have pushed further north than Imuris, Sonora. This site had previously been believed to be the northernmost extent of the species circa ~2000, but within the last 25ish years it seems as though the higher elevation habitat north of Imuris has become habitable for this species. Whether or not that is due to climate change, an urban heat island effect in Nogales, or this species adapting to a cooler climate, I am not sure.
As much as I would love to, I cannot take all of the credit for this observation. @ameeds recently made me aware of a BugGuide post by entomologist Salvador Vitanza, where he thoroughly imaged and documented Atta mexicana workers at this exact locality in Nogales, AZ. I was so dumbfounded that within 2 days I was at the locality to verify for myself, and sure enough I found almost exactly what was detailed in the BugGuide Post.
https://bugguide.net/node/view/2306508
Once I confirmed that there were, in fact, Atta workers here, my next task was to locate the colony's "center", the large pile of waste fungus created by these ants above their nesting site. The "nest entrance" detailed by Salvador Vitanza was clearly just a foraging entrance; this species creates underground tunnels from their nest to more fruitful foraging areas - up to 150 meters in any given direction. However, due to the foraging entrance in question having a foraging trail over 100 meters long (BugGuide post says 140m, but I observed the trail fading out at around 105m - trail length likely varies day-by-day). This long trail most likely means that the colony's center was nearby to the foraging entrance. It is worth noting that all foraging activity was on the south side of the street - not a single worker was seen on the north side of the street.
I began my search by exploring the undeveloped land around the property. Unfortunately this area is quite steep, which made it somewhat difficult to survey, but upon searching thoroughly, all I was able to find was an additional foraging entrance underneath a tree located against a backyard wall of the property the original foraging entrance was in front of. I did peer over the wall, but was unable to see any obvious signs of Atta within the backyard of the property.
In the front yard of the property, very close to the original foraging entrance, I noticed 2 additional foraging entrances. One was located in a crack in the walkway , with workers foraging along the side of a concrete barrier for a garden. The second was located in the yard next to a large stone, and had a relatively large and pronounced entrance similar to the one located next to the street. From this entrance a short trail traveled to a Juniper tree, where workers were thoroughly removing plant material and bringing it inside. To see Atta harvesting Juniper so enthusiastically was astonishing to me - I never expected conifers to be a potential food item to Atta.
Given that all four of the foraging entrances I found were centered around this property, and no additional foraging entrances were found away from the property, I suspect the colony's nest is located on the property. I have included a map (last image) of the four foraging entrances and the location of the main long trail.
As a last note on this colony, I do suspect that it is a mature colony. Given the long foraging trails, wide array of plant materials being accepted, and presence of alates in the area, it is likely this colony has been in the area for several years now, and has had the opportunity to spread offspring to other parts of Nogales.
After thoroughly documenting this Atta colony, I explored the rest of the street and a bit of the surrounding area to search for more colonies, but could not find any. I definitely do not expect that this is the only colony in Nogales, AZ, but I was unable to find any additional signs of the species in my limited search. More extensive and widespread searching will definitely be required to find additional signs of this species in Nogales, AZ.
The last note has to do with the male alates found in this observation: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/179394123
Given that Green Valley is around 35 miles north of Nogales - almost the same distance between Imuris and Nogales, it seems there are only 2 possible explanations. Either those male alates hitchhiked on a truck from Nogales to Green Valley (not impossible considering I-19), or this species extends much further north into AZ than anyone expected. The latter has some merit - previously the higher elevation environment around Nogales was the main barrier preventing Atta from spreading northwards. With this habitat now suitable, I believe there is effectively nothing but time preventing this species from spreading even further north. This may seem like a long-shot, but I suspect that if this population in Nogales is able to persist, we will be seeing Atta in Tucson in the next 30 years.
adrenaline booster
Very easy nests to miss, unlike other Melophorus species nests. Only one, or rarely two workers seem to come out of the nest at once, and only every 10-20 seconds.
interesting hunting behavior where groups of Strumigenys sit together on a leaf
Operárias carregando imaturas para fora do ninho. Registro após às 18h30.
Video clip#1
Clip #2
quite interesting how the males fly more of a straight line crashing into others while females make halts quick turns and zigzags
by 8 am only males were left and the swarm dwindled
a separate observation for the males
maybe I should have gone more easy with the shutter speed..
Found with @cheetolord02, his observation is linked here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/149703302
I dug out and moved a complete nest that was too close to our balcony.
Several Solenopsis workers found inside a Pheidole tepicana colony. Worker morphology appears to suggest S. phoretica-group; when compared to known workers of Solenopsis enigmatica (A phoretica-group species from Dominica known from queens and workers), certain similarities are noticeable, such as the sparse pilosity and 10-segmented antennae. 4 Solenopsis workers and a full series of Pheidole tepicana were collected, and will be properly pinned and imaged by Arizona State University soon. I will update this observation with those pictures once I get them.
In the wild, these ants were observed inside the nest chambers of Pheidole tepicana. One worker was observed carrying a pupa. These ants seemed to follow the trails of P. tepicana inside the nest. After collection, Pheidole tepicana workers were observed carrying the Solenopsis workers, who curled into a pupal position (4th image). Thanks to @mason_s for the high quality live images.
S. phoretica-group is not yet known from Arizona, nor have they been associated with P. tepicana.
Short video from the encounter with these ants in the wild: https://youtu.be/dOIiEoAoesc
Single gyne and >100 workers found under rock
So, this is a polyergus bilateral gynandromorph! ½ worker caste (red), ½ alate (black). The mandibles, eyes, single wing, and antennae are the more obvious caste traits reflected in each half of this individual. Found them shortly after leaving the colony possibly (I found one a few feet away).
See: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/124878696
& https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/124879042
Observed on a Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) tree. Approx. 3-4mm.
found in (and returned to) soil while gardening
Recently described by M. Prebus in 2021, the type collection is from Boca Chica TX, where the SpaceX launchpad is located. An explosion of a SpaceX rocket on 30 March 2021 prompted outrage from the biologist and naturalist community.
Following the subsequent damage of relatively pristine endangered habitat from rocket debris and 4WD vehicle recovery efforts, it was decided to name this species after SpaceX CEO and founder Elon Musk.
The species epithet misomoschus means "hatred of Musk".
I'm somewhat sure this is mysticum since queens were flying, but I'm having trouble distinguishing from M. rogeri. The clypeus looks round enough for mysticum...
Extracted from under the bark of a dead log. Log had been pointed out to me by Fielisy "Fidel" Bemaheva, who is an extremely knowledgeable old hand at Madagascar ants.
Found by station manager Santatra Tototsara. Apparently attracted to white sheets around noon.
A very large amount of larvae in nest of Tetramorium caespitum. Easily recognized by the hairless head. Fourth Danish record, and the first from Jutland. On the 21st of April, almost all of the collected larvae had pupated. On the 4th of May, most were fully developed adults.
dates approximate
fedding the brood with a Geophilidae centipede.
Larvae kept excreting clear droplets concentrating the intake
Found under a rock. Coolest ants I've ever seen! I think some either had no eyes or extremely small eyes.
A single worker found at the edge of a hardwood/conifer forest remnant. Microhabitat a pine needle bed over a red clay and humus mixture under an American sweetgum tree. Other ants present included Brachymyrmex depilis, Crematogaster cf. lineolata, and Aphaenogaster fulva-rudis-texana complex sp. Collected using a Davis sifter.
collected by members of the Elias Lab: https://nature.berkeley.edu/eliaslab/
Location approximate
Third Danish record. In nest of Tetramorium caespitum